Synergistic Effects of Organic and Inorganic Nutrient Sources on Nutrient Uptake and Productivity of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

Volume 14, Issue 55, 2025 (July – September)


Research Article
Synergistic Effects of Organic and Inorganic Nutrient Sources on Nutrient Uptake and Productivity of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)
Siddharath Godara, Mahipal Dudwal, Ramesh Chand Choudhary, Raju Singh Jakhar and Rahul Sihag
Keywords: Growth, RDF, Vermicompost, and Yield
DOI:10.37273/chesci.cs232056082


Full Text – PDF


Abstract

The present investigation entitled “Synergistic Effects of Organic and Inorganic Nutrient Sources on Nutrient Uptake and Productivity of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)” was carried out at the Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, Vivekananda Global University, Jaipur, Rajasthan. The experiment was laid out in Randomized block design with eight treatments replicated thrice. The experiment was comprised with eight treatment viz., T1-control, T2- RDF 100%, T3- Vermicompost 10 t/ha, T4- FYM 20 t/ha, T5- RDF 75% + FYM 5 t/ha, T6- RDF 50% + FYM 10 t/ha, T7- RDF 50% + Vermicompost 5 t/ha and T8- RDF 75% + Vermicompost 2.5 t/ha. The treatment with application of T8- RDF 75% + Vermicompost 2.5 t/ha was recorded significantly higher plant height (107.63 cm), number of tillers/running row meter (66.32), plant dry weight (22.31 g/plant) and crop growth rate (25.73 g/m2/day). Treatment RDF 75% + Vermicompost 2.5 t/ha (T8) significantly improved the yield attributes viz., number of effective tillers per plant (278.85) and number of grain per spike (52.27). However, T7- RDF 50% + Vermicompost 5 t/ha, T6- RDF 50% + FYM 10 t/ha and T5- RDF 75% + FYM 5 t/ha was found to be statistically at par with T8- RDF 75% + Vermicompost 2.5 t/ha. For test weight difference between treatments was observed non-significant.
The treatment T8- RDF 75% + Vermicompost 2.5 t/ha registered significantly higher values of N, P and K uptake in seed as well as grain. The maximum cost of cultivation (INR 40755.10 /ha), maximum gross return (INR 1,30,130.17/ha), maximum gross return (INR 1,30,130.17/ha), maximum net return (INR 89,375.07/ha) and maximum benefit cost ratio (2.19) was observed in T8- RDF 75% + Vermicompost 2.5 t/ha. Whereas the minimum cost of cultivation ((INR 38399.10 /ha), minimum net return ((INR 68,870.27/ha)) and minimum benefit cost ration (1.79) was observed in treatment T1-control.


References

  1. Bairwa SK, Verma R, Meena M, Kumawat SM. Effect of zinc fertilization on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L) under southern Rajasthan conditions. Int J Chem Stud 2021; 9(2):1743–1746.
  2. Biswas DR, Narayanasamy G. Integrated nutrient management in wheat: long-term effect of FYM and fertilizers. Indian J Agric Sci 2006; 76(2):87–90.
  3. Singh Y, Singh BP, Sekhon GS. Fertilizer use efficiency and balance sheet of nutrients under integrated nutrient management systems. Indian J Agric Sci 2003; 73(10):577–580.
  4. Choudhary MA, Gill MA, Hussain A. Productivity and nutrient uptake of barley under integrated nutrient management. Pak J Agric Res 2012; 25(1):14–18.
  5. Brar BS, Dhillon NS, Dhillon KS. Long-term effects of inorganic and organic fertilizers on crop productivity and soil fertility. Indian J Agric Sci 2011; 81(5):408–412.
  6. Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. 4th ed. New Delhi: ICAR; 1985.
  7. Kapoor A, Singh R, Singh VK, Serawat M, Vishwakarma DK. Effect of organic, inorganic and biofertilizers on growth and yields of mungbean (Vigna radiatus L. Wilczek). Biol Forum Int J 2023; 15(2):929–937.
  8. Sharma V, Yadav SK, Meena RS. Impact of INM on soil fertility and productivity of barley. J Cereal Res 2020; 12(1):45–50.
  9. Kumar V, Ahlawat IPS. Effect of organic manures and fertilizers on barley productivity. Indian J Agron 2012; 57(2):137–140.
  10. Ali SM. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of wheat and barley. MSc Thesis, UAS, Bengaluru; 2014.
  11. Tiwari R, Patel M, Sharma A, Verma S. Economic viability of integrated nutrient management in wheat. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 2023; 12(2):2310–2314.